Reviewers scores

Reviewing abstracts

This section is for abstract reviewers only.

All reviewers to score abstracts assigned to them, unless you have a conflict of interest.
If so, you can just omit scoring that abstract.

Scoring Guidelines, we ask you to consider the following:

hypothesis
experimental design
creativity
innovation
scientific results and significance

Use the following scoring system and to use the full range of the scale:
5 - Superior (top 10% of abstracts), highest priority for award, truly excellent and outstanding
4 - Exceptional (top 20% of abstracts), not perfect, but excellent science, high priority for award
3 - Very good (top 35% of abstracts), high quality, but not excellent science
2 - Good, average abstract, but not good enough for award if funding is limited
1 - Low priority, will not be considered for award

Your mean score should be ~2.5, and only 20% should be 4 or higher. (see bar chart below)

Reviewing needs to be completed by end of Saturday 28th March 2020.

If you need further help please email support@isd-de.org.

Protected: Reviewers scores

Protected: Reviewers scores

Reviewing abstracts

Protected: Reviewers scores

Protected: Reviewers scores

Share this post

Reviewing abstracts